For Sale, due to circumstances: television. As good as new. Barely used. Has always been inside. Many channels (almost infinite) and additional choices for laughable malfunctioning ‘smart TV’ online. Includes remote control, HDMI cable, SCART cable and mounting bracket. Against any reasonable offer.
Detailed Description:
A television ( “TV”), also known as ‘TV’ in the vernacular, is a offline media that so-called ‘television’ are available. Unlike online programs this ‘television’ is not on demand , such as Netflix, and determines the channel for you at any time can be seen these programs. It is therefore not possible to view programs at a time when you want it. These programs are otherwise “programmed level,” meaning that they have fixed broadcast times on set days so that you know as a viewer when you “should stay at home” (note the word ‘must’) if you want to see something.
Through the ‘remote’ (working with old infrared signals, definitely not to be confused with Wi-Fi or Bluetooth ) is it possible to switch channels, this is the so-called zap . The purpose of the zap is other content to see but curiously all content remains the same each time. Particularly in programs known as NPO (Dutch Public Broadcasting, which, involuntarily, is funded by taxpayers) is virtually all content on virtually anytime totally interchangeable. Despite the fact that this NPO less than three channels at its disposal, which can be broadcast 24 hours a day, this NPO all never manage to bring some variation in the content offered.
However, say drivers various public members broadcasters (ie broadcasters that are based on completely outdated philosophical and ideological views that last important were in the seventies of the last century, also known as “compartmentalization”) constantly that NPOs very diverse and multiform is’, but this is always to be propaganda to save their own job. Directors of broadcasting companies often earn many tons per year.
F.A.Q. on the phenomenon of ‘TV’
If I put this TV sale and in my house, which then cause damage to human or animal?
Yes, TV watching can be very harmful. The brain activity of a coma patient is relatively higher than the brain activity of a television viewer. So who is watching television often changes slowly into a coma patient. That’s probably pick the reason most avid television viewers in the Netherlands aged or being in a comatose state.
What information I can at home via the ‘TV’?
you can gather multiple types of information via the television, there is the ‘floor’ (news, backgrounds, paternalism, moralism, demonization of dissent) and the so-called ‘entertainment’ (celebrities so) . By you anyway to provide paid public broadcasters attempt especially at floor ‘, in which they usually fail. The bowl becoming more common that the promised ‘floor’ is nothing but flat ‘entertainment’. Usually the ‘floor’ totally ruined by the presence of ‘celebrity’, a symptom of watching television suffering terminally ill Netherlands.
The ‘entertainment’ you get especially when you opt for programs (many ) commercial broadcasters. Pretty much everything is broadcast by commercial broadcasters is ‘entertainment’, although there are also some news programs and as ‘informative’ camouflaged talk shows that mainly serve to promote the program makers of the private channel.
Annoying here is, however, that are the creators of these news celebrities, so too the news is finally a kind of entertainment. A good example is Yahoo! News -anchor Roelof Hemmen, who acts he newsreader is and can tell the innocent public almost daily through the online channels RTL what moral deugend and high pathetically good man he reality, which has made it impossible to accept “objective” information packed Roelof Hemmen.
‘Entertainment’ is not necessarily informative. This has also celebrity by definition never informative. The average celebrity on television is essentially a type of tumor which indicates the presence of a malignant disease. Just like a metastatic cancer tumors grow rapidly, taking in the Netherlands, the celebrities rapidly increasing. Given the current number of celebrities can only conclude that the best television watching Netherlands is in a terminal phase. Euthanasia is based on the best and most humane solution.
Why is this so-called ‘NPOs less than three channels?
Nobody knows. What we do know is that the third channel (Ned 3) by virtually no one is viewed. For years. That this third channel still exists has to do with the aforementioned drivers of public broadcasters. There are dozens of people who alone unimaginable amounts of money from the existence of this third channel. They will therefore do everything to perpetuate this channel. For these applications it tested “verschillige ‘and’ in society standing ‘methods as:. Lie, cheat, scam, propaganda, lobbying and moral blackmail
If the commercial stations produce only’ entertainment ‘ why the audiences too? Is not that unfair competition and therefore illegal state aid?
Yes, it is unfair competition and yes it is illegal state aid. That this all can and must, despite the Media Act, which provides crystal clear that this should not, once again has to do with the lying and cheating broadcasting directors and also with politics. There are, on the PVV after, no political parties who dare to criticize the functioning of the public broadcaster. This is mainly because their members from the same elderly and comateuzen exists as supporters of the broadcasters.
In addition, the largest public broadcaster VARA, also broadcasting in line ideological and propagandistic seen seamlessly with the Labour Party. The PvdA is indeed dying but that theoretically in the polls. In practice, they are in the government and also with a lot of seats in the Senate. Until new elections, the PvdA so much power and will also do little to change the operation of the public broadcasters. If only because the Labour Party without the NPO, and thus without the VARA, anyway no seats wins because nobody even knows that they exist.
There was recently a State of the VVD which has attempted to modernize the ancient and outdated public broadcasters Slightly but which is now almost completely wiped out. That was easy, first because the State in question has just as a man who calls himself a feminist as many balls, secondly because he VVD is where integrity is just as popular as a severe intestinal infection and thirdly because many former broadcaster drivers , journalists and program makers after a long career in which they have enriched with public money in the second and especially Senate ended up itself
also, the lobby huge for the preservation of public broadcasters. the fact that public broadcasters are guilty is undermined by NPO lobbyists to unfair competition as “nonsense” because “a lot of entertainment for the NPO is important to hold the spotlight for informational offerings.”
such insane, irrational reasoning by many politicians just swallowed like hot cake.
If all information is shown on the TV, this is good information?
Yes. The information is, by definition, not objective, colored and left-center to the extreme left. There are exceptions such as EenVandaag , a current affairs program that is made by the traditional “liberal” TROS and AVRO, but you can safely say that 90 percent of the ‘informative’ range is the same as certain 1400 times Volkskrant.
Attempts to change this by adding “right” sites like WNL and Powned only much hilarity caused by the laughable poor quality of their programs, with some easing of the obscure leftist dogmatic but outdated naive worldview of informative programs they have contributed nothing to date.
the news from the ideologically independent and objective NOS (Dutch Broadcasting Foundation) is almost always colored. Despite the fact that it has improved in recent years and the ‘Journals (news) have become much more objective, it is still noticeable that the majority of journalists left to very left and moralizing of TV viewers as additional see mission statement. The majority of journalists is also old to very old, like the majority of the audience.
It is useful to already know before buying a television set which information is unreliable anyway. Below is the list of topics that you can avoid better on TV:
– refugees
– nature and environment
–
economy – car use
– the rule of law
– US presidential election
– Dutch elections
– media
– Israel
– Europe
in dealing with these topics, you can be sure that certain information be omitted, distorted, modified, added or ignored. Also, in these subjects often use manipulation through selective images and ditto assembly and the subject deliberately distorted by a reporter with a private agenda.
Is there really a reason to buy a television set?
Hardly. The advantage of a TV in the living room is that when eating to Family Guy or South Park can be looked at and in the summer there is always Tour de France what the ultimate animated wallpaper is a bowl of goldfish after
For the rest, the TV no value:. the entertainment is usually so imbecile that you can not look back we also if you would like, the BN ‘ers are a kind of stalking terror of political correctness that does not go away more of your retina at one time, the news get yourself the best of the internet and the pair indeed great movies and series you can just (illegally, because despite the lies of the entertainment industry, there is still no good legal offers) download from the internet, so when you see the best possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment